INTRO by Adrienne
Some of you here are old enough to remember the movie Harvey (the one with the invisible rabbit),
it starred Jimmy Stewart. It was made
back in 1950, but replayed countless times.
Well, Jimmy is no longer with us, and Harvey has finally run out of
royalties the movie has earned him and has taken a very unusual job for a
rabbit. He has taken a job as a
spokesperson for the Parkinson’s Action Network. There is only one problem, however, he’s
still an invisible rabbit that only certain special kinds of people can see or
hear. Luckily, he found one right here
among us, my assistant, Jim. So here,
making yet another public appearance together are Jim and Harvey the Invisible
Rabbit talking about PAN.
(To Harvey) Harvey, this is a special
group of people, they are the _______________, but you have them at a
disadvantage—they don’t know what you are.
May I tell them?
(To the audience) Harvey is a pooka—a
Celtic fairy, given to various acts of mischief and to taking form as a larger
than life animal—in this case a six foot, three and a half inch rabbit. I know some pookas speak to all humans, but
Harvey is not always audible or visible to all humans—just to drunkards,
crackpots and the like. So, if you’re
able to see him just now, you want to keep that under your hat. On the other hand, this would be a big step
for him, talking to all sorts of people—if he wasn’t so determined to use me
for a mouthpiece.
(To Harvey) So, Harvey, you are back
again as a spokesperson for PAN, but some of these folks have not heard from
you before, what’s PAN?
(to all) Oh, the Parkinson’s Action Network, the voice
of the Parkinson’s community on Capitol Hill and lots of other places.
(to Harvey) What’s that Harvey? This is your favorite kind of
audience—they’re PIPS. I get it. (to all) People interested in Parkinson’s.
(to Harvey) Tell the folks about me and PD? Sure.
(To all) I was diagnosed in 2009, and
started taking the usual assortment of drugs to control the symptoms. I decided also to work on what my neurologist
said was his number one recommendation—get an hour of exercise every day. So I started working on my overall physical
health, things like--getting enough sleep, developing better eating and drinking habits
(these are still a work in progress) and getting in the habit of exercising an
hour a day. I took up yoga, pilates and I
even Tai Chi. So, I have really worked
on myself, and I feel lots better. This
approach allowed me to keep working for three more years, but I had to stop in
the summer of 2012. So, now you know my
story.
But we all have questions about
Parkinson’s, Harvey. Maybe you can
answer them.
(To Harvey) What questions?
1. Well, for one
thing, how quickly will this progress?
(To Harvey) No one knows?
(To all) Oh, Harvey wants you to know
research is going to tell
us.
2. Well, do we at
least know how to slow it down?
(To Harvey) We don’t?
(To All) Harvey says researchers are getting closer
to finding some effective therapies to slow it down.
3. I have a trembling hand and leg
and occasional loss of balance. What
else can I expect, Harvey? (pause)
(To Harvey) You don’t know…(listens)
(To all) But researchers are cataloging Parkinson’s effects.
4. Well, what about the cause of
those effects? What
causes Parkinson’s? (listens)
(To Harvey) We don’t know, huh? (listens)
(To All) Ah, but researchers are working on it.
5. What about a cure?
(To Harvey) A long way to go, you
say?
(To All) Oh, more research
is needed.
(To Harvey) Wow, with all this need
for research, things must really be clipping along in that arena. (listens)
They’re not?!??
Is this Parkinson’s Action Network
working on it? (pause)
(To Harvey) So how is PAN working on the
problem today?
Three ways, you say? What’s the first one?
Protecting and maybe increasing government research funding and expedited
drug approval. Harvey, what does this funding need to be
protected from? See kweh what? SEQUESTRATION. Harvey, you must be the only rabbit on the
planet who knows that word. What does it
mean? Oh, across-the-board cuts in
government spending, without regard to the importance of that spending. Is Congress doing this on purpose? It sounds like they are just not willing to
think about which things are the most important. Oh, they never meant for it to really happen? But they couldn’t agree on what cuts to
make. Sounds like the Congress we know
and love—yeah, the one we elected. But
what happens to Parkinson’s funding?
A cut of $1.6B from National Institutes of Health and $209M from the Food and Drug Administration. Why is that so important, don’t the drug companies do that work? No? NIH does more basic research than anyone else in the world? The drug companies don’t get started until there’s a product. Wow, I’d better be writing my Congressman, and my Senators, too.
A cut of $1.6B from National Institutes of Health and $209M from the Food and Drug Administration. Why is that so important, don’t the drug companies do that work? No? NIH does more basic research than anyone else in the world? The drug companies don’t get started until there’s a product. Wow, I’d better be writing my Congressman, and my Senators, too.
But Harvey, why is the FDA funding
important? Oh, without additional
monies, promising products will be held up in the approval process as fewer
people are around to approve new drug therapies. I really do need to write my
Congressmen. What about PAN’s other two
priorities?
Making permanent the elimination of caps on physical therapy under
Medicare? How does that work? (To audience) Oh, Congress enacted caps on
physical, occupational and speech therapies back in 1997, but never put them
into effect until 2006. When people
objected, they created an exception process, but it has to be renewed each
year. PAN wants to get rid of these
caps once and for all. What’s that
Harvey? We can’t count on Congress to
agree on anything year after year? I
agree, except for not applying rules like this one to themselves. Is there a deadline for reapproval? By December 31st. We’d better tell them to get to work. Where’s my pen? That’s another letter.
What’s the third priority for PAN, Harvey? Growing the Congressional Caucus on Parkinson’s. What’s that? (to the audience) It’s a forum for both senate and house members to increase awareness and keep informed on the latest developments in Parkinson’s issues and research developments. Harvey, how many members are there now? A hundred and seventy-two? Out of how many? Five hundred thirty five. We can do better than that. How many of ours are members (Graham, Scott and Sanford?) None. I think I feel another letter coming! Wait, wait. You have? Great. That will save some work. Harvey says he has brought several letters you can use to let your representatives know how you feel. We’ll pass them out now. All you need to do is write in your name, address and phone number and sign. Harvey will take care of the rest.
What’s the third priority for PAN, Harvey? Growing the Congressional Caucus on Parkinson’s. What’s that? (to the audience) It’s a forum for both senate and house members to increase awareness and keep informed on the latest developments in Parkinson’s issues and research developments. Harvey, how many members are there now? A hundred and seventy-two? Out of how many? Five hundred thirty five. We can do better than that. How many of ours are members (Graham, Scott and Sanford?) None. I think I feel another letter coming! Wait, wait. You have? Great. That will save some work. Harvey says he has brought several letters you can use to let your representatives know how you feel. We’ll pass them out now. All you need to do is write in your name, address and phone number and sign. Harvey will take care of the rest.
What’s that Harvey? (To
All) He says “please,” and “thanks for your attention.”
No comments:
Post a Comment